Here is my testing of the method I was attempting to use. I used normal computer paper, a toothpick, an ink stamp, modeling clay, and “play-doh” At first, I had accidentally flipped the name, so I had to note to reverse in accordance to the mirrored image printed. For both materials, the toothpick was used to carve in initials by using a multiple poke method similar to a much slower, more careful sort of machine engraving. The play-doh picked up the ink and left an impression relatively well, but because of its softness it can be slightly difficult to mold while keeping its shape without accidental distortion. There was tiny resistance when leaving the paper, but nothing major that I can foresee causing problems, even with the thinness of vellum. It did not leave any sort of impression of oils or other ingredients in its composition, which was a relief, meaning that I could utilize this without any problems of mixing it with the ink. Even with rolling and reuse, there was no residue from previous entries either, regardless of the color used. As far as I can tell, the only issues I might have with this are if it dries up, but that probably will not happen if it is constantly changing shape. I guess since the old days the company had made it less prone to dry as fast, as it stayed within the same density and softness as when I first picked it out, even after using the clay. Not too shabby.
The clay was where I had more fear, and was more surprised. Compared to the play-doh, it is harder, a bit tougher to remold, and a slight bit messier due to residue on my hands (I suppose you get what you pay for though, as it was not high-quality or a brand I was familiar with). Regardless of that, it was easier to engrave without fear of distortion. It was also a bit easier to smooth out in the regard of rough edges. When applying ink, there was no mixing of oils on the pad or the paper, which was a relief. It also goes on and comes off smoother than the play-doh. I tried using an alternate “deep-gash” method when working with the clay to variable success. It is a slight bit messier, but seems to leave a better impression. The only problem is that it only works well for angular letters. I could see curves and circles being a problem with the straight and angular gashing technique. The clays roughness when being engraved and impression upon stamping give a slightly more archaic feel that the play-doh from what I was able to tell. This would work a bit better to convey the ancient style I hope to accomplish in this work. My sole concern is that it might dry faster than the play-doh, so I would have to keep it contained somehow or at least constantly re-roll it.
I tried a sort of mix of the two properties, but it left my hands marred and its reaction when placed upon the paper was less than positive. Nice to get these mishaps out of the way before I do serious work, I suppose. As a result of my tests, I feel that it might be best to give the person a choice of the type of medium they would like to stamp and work with. I will also have larger quantities for stamping as these were just tests. I hope this has made the type of goal I wish to accomplish a bit clearer.



























































































